Safeguards To Ensure Suitability of Adults Who Foster or Adopt Children Who Have Endured Traumatic Past
Questions
Ms Nadia Ahmad Samdin asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) what safeguards are in place to ensure the suitability of adults who express interest in adopting children, especially children who have endured traumatic pasts; and (b) what measures exist to prevent incidents of abuse by such adults.
Ms He Ting Ru asked the Minister for Social and Family Development whether the Ministry will (i) enhance existing training schemes of social workers and professionals handling cases of vulnerable underaged persons to detect sexual and other forms of abuse and (ii) strengthen its due diligence and surveillance over the youth development firms the Ministry works with that have exposure to vulnerable underaged persons.
Answer
The Minister of State for Social and Family Development (Ms Sun Xueling) (for the Minister for Social and Family Development): Sir, may I have your permission to take both questions – Question Nos 8 and 9 – together?
Mr Speaker: Please proceed.
Ms Sun Xueling: Ms Nadia and Ms He probably have in mind a recently reported case where a child from a children's home was sexually abused by a kith caregiver. Kith caregivers are adults who are not related to a child and meet the child through family or community connections, and are not registered as foster parents. I would like to clarify
that while the offender and his wife had expressed the desire to adopt the child, they had not taken any steps to start the adoption process. I would also like to clarify that the offender's firm was not working with the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF), but directly with the children's home.
Ms Nadia asked about the safeguards in the adoption process. The primary consideration when processing applications for adopting children is the child's welfare and best interest of the child. There are various steps in the adoption process to ensure this.
During the first stage, prospective adopters must undergo a comprehensive Adoption
Suitability Assessment. This is conducted by social service staff from an accredited
adoption agency. Prospective adopters are assessed on a range of factors including their
ability to provide a protective and nurturing environment, their motivations for adoption,
stability of the marital relationship and overall capacity to meet the child's needs.
Prospective adopters also undergo screening for risk factors, including criminal records.
If found suitable, prospective adopters receive a favourable Home Study Report.
This allows them to search for a child to adopt through adoption agencies or their own
contacts. Once a child is identified, the adopters then make an application to the Court.
As part of the adoption proceedings, the Court will appoint MSF as the Guardian-in-
Adoption.
Where the child is already being cared for by the family, an MSF officer will conduct
a social investigation to check on the safety and well-being of the child in the family,
including whether the prospective adopters are providing good care for the child and
meeting the child's needs. This stage involves interviews with the child about the child's
views on the adoption, checks with character referees and consultations with the
applicants' support network, which could include household members, friends, teachers
and social service professionals working with the family.
Ms He asked how the contact between children and staff, volunteers and vendors is
overseen. Social workers and professionals employed at our children homes receive
compulsory training to recognise signs and symptoms of sexual and other forms of abuse.
Professionals at MSF's accredited adoption agencies also receive training to help them
identify abuse.
Staff, volunteers and personnel engaged by children's homes are screened for prior
criminal records before they have contact with children. In the recently reported case,
these procedures were followed by the home. The offender did not have a prior criminal
record.
This incident is very regrettable, and all the professionals and social service workers
who have been in contact with the child are shaken. Based on our knowledge, the
children's home had made every effort to perform due diligence on persons who have
contact with the child and to supervise the contact. The social service professionals had
also followed up actively with supervised visitations, check-ins and house visits.
While every effort is made to ensure adopted children enter families that provide a
safe environment, it is not possible to predict with absolute certainty how the relationship
between an adopted child and the adoptive parents develops.
We are very grateful to the teacher whom the child confided in. This shows the
critical role of having trusted individuals in one's life. We would like to call out to
everyone, whether a teacher, neighbour or friend, to promptly report abuse when they
come to know of it or suspect it. We need the collective help of everyone to protect the
safety of our children.
Mr Speaker, the MSF will continue to emphasise to the homes the importance of
selecting and training their volunteers well, and to constantly monitor their residents'
safety and well-being. At the same time, we should not let this incident make homes
reluctant to work with community partners and volunteers, many who do good work and
befriend children and run recreational and other activities for them out of a desire to help
the children. It would be a shame if our homes isolated children from well-intentioned
volunteers who wish to help them.
Mr Speaker: Ms Nadia Samdin.
Ms Nadia Ahmad Samdin (Ang Mo Kio): I thank the Minister of State for her
reply. Indeed, with many other Singaporeans, I think we were very disturbed when this
case first came to light. I would like to ask three follow-up supplementary questions.
First, if the Minister of State could provide more details of this kith caregiver
scheme, in terms of how the volunteers are assessed to be suitable and managed over a
long period of time, that would be very helpful.
Second, given that the abuse, very unfortunately, happened over a prolonged period
and throughout this time the youth was actually receiving social service support. What
improvements are the home and MSF putting in place to try and avoid from such
incidents happening again?
Finally, given that MSF does work through various agencies, be it through the
adoption agencies or other social service agencies (SSAs), such as this kith caregiver
scheme, how does MSF ensure the rigour of supervision, check-ins, home reports, and
how is this applied equally across the different agencies that MSF works with?
Ms Sun Xueling: I thank Ms Nadia for her questions. On the first point, there are two
schemes that we are talking about. You had mentioned kith caregivers and volunteers.
There could also be instances where volunteers are not kith caregivers. So, I would touch
on both the points.
For kith caregivers, before a caregiver is identified to provide care for a child or a
young person under MSF's care, like I have mentioned before, background checks and
assessments are conducted by trained professionals. For this particular case, MSF had
conducted background checks on the man and his wife before they were identified as
caregivers for the child. They had no adverse records.
Trained professionals had also assessed the couple as capable of providing adequate
and safe care for the child. There had also been paced contacts between the couple and
the young person that had ranged from supervised visitations at the treatment centre to
outings and home leave, before the couple provided full-time care for the child.
There were regular therapy sessions, check-ins and home visits conducted by the
professionals, both prior to and during the child's home leave and while under the
couple’s care. And during these interactions, the professionals had observed that the
couple provided supportive care and they did not identify any signs or symptoms
indicative of sexual abuse by the caregiver.
The child did not disclose any abuse to the professionals until she informed her
school teacher in November 2020. From what I understand, the sexual abuse was
between the period of September 2020 and November 2020, whereas the interactions that
the child had with this caregiver started in 2019.
Coming back to volunteers, which was another aspect of the Member's question, I
had mentioned before that all volunteers in MSF-funded programmes who have contact
with clients, will need to undergo suitability assessments and background checks. These
are run by the agencies. So, as part of the suitability assessment, all prospective
volunteers must provide information about their areas of interest in volunteering, the
skills and expertise that they have to offer, any medical concerns and any prior criminal
convictions.
The SSA will then review the submitted information and interview these prospective
volunteers to better understand their motivations and abilities to support the SSA's
programmes and engagement with clients. Background checks are also conducted to
verify the information which has been provided including screening for criminal records
and to identify other risk factors including adverse history.
Interviews with character references and checks with other SSAs where the
prospective volunteer may have previously volunteered in, are also performed.
I will now like to go to her second question, which I believe was about what more
we can do, if I am not wrong.
I had talked about the training that all social service professionals have to undergo.
For staff at children's homes, they have to attend compulsory training courses. This
include understanding the legal frameworks and the legislation that protects children in
state care. They also have to undergo training and strategies to identify child abuse and
how to keep children safe. This training is provided by the NCSS Social Service Institute
(SSI) in Singapore.
The training courses are either developed by MSF or in partnership with local
stakeholders from the social service, education, health and law enforcement sectors. The
training includes evidence-based assessment frameworks, which are recognised
internationally, to promote safety and well-being for children and young persons at risk
of neglect or abuse. And this training has been contextualised to the Singapore context.
Just to give a few examples of this training. The training courses include introduction
to the child protection framework, the sector-specific screening guide and the child abuse
reporting guide.
The Member may recall that we had a task force on family violence, and family
violence includes many forms of violence, including sexual abuse. This was co-chaired
by myself and Minister of State Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim. We had earlier
recommended to develop consistent, standardised assessment and screening tools to
enable frontline professionals to better identify and detect family violence cases, of which
sexual abuse is one form of it.
This is to manage the risks and needs of survivors and also perpetrators, and know
when to report cases.
MSF will progressively be launching a suite of tools to ensure a more robust and
consistent decision-making system for the domestic violence sector. So, this is something
that we are working on to make sure that not only has there been training provided to
social service professionals, but that there are standardised assessment tools so that the
social service professionals know what the baselines are and under what circumstances to
report.
Finally, on the Member's last point, MSF meets with the SSAs regularly. The SSI is
also a platform where the SSAs come together regularly to receive up-to-date training.
Learning from this episode, I think it is a stern reminder to all of us that we will
continue to focus on making sure our social service professionals are up-to-date when it
comes to training, to recognise family violence, domestic violence, sexual abuse and to
know when to report, what are the symptoms to look out for. But at the same time, I think
it is also a clear reminder to all of us that we have to work with many other community
partners, including teachers, because in this case, it was a teacher who reported after the
child confided in the teacher.
We must recognise that even as our social service professionals continue with
supervised visitations, home check-ins, house visits, this may not take place on a daily
basis. Whereas if we compare that to a child's interaction with a teacher at school or a
neighbour to the home, these are almost daily interactions, if not daily interactions; there
is more opportunity for a child to share instances of neglect and abuse. I think this is a
call to action for more members of the public to be aware of what are the signs of family
violence, domestic abuse, sexual abuse.
MSF has been very active in rolling out the MSF’s Family and Domestic Violence
Awareness Training, which is part of the Break the Silence campaign. We have reached
out to 7,550 individuals, which include preschool teachers, students at the National
Institute of Education (NIE), teachers in our foreign system schools. And we will
continue in this effort to make sure that more members of the public are aware of the
signs to look out for and in so doing, all of us can better protect the safety of our children.
Mr Speaker: Ms He Ting Ru.
Ms He Ting Ru (Sengkang): Thank you, Mr Speaker. I have a couple of
supplementary questions. The first is, I think the Minister of State mentioned earlier
about the importance that teachers can play in this. I just wanted to know, is there and
what is the basic training given to preschool educators and assistants to enable them to
recognise these signs? Is there a very general training that is available to these preschool
educators to enable them to detect signs and symptoms of abuse in children, given that
children of this age are usually less able to articulate or verbalise what is happening to
them?
My second supplementary question relates to, when we talk about training given to
educators and to people who work within the social services sector, especially those with
vulnerable young children, we talk about reporting and understanding the reporting
framework. I would like to check whether this training that is given to them also includes
training about how best they can respond initially to a child coming up to them and
telling them potentially that they have been — or recognising that this child might
actually be a victim? I am just wondering whether or not there is basic training given to
teach them how to respond and how best to first respond to these children, so that these
children are not further traumatised or are better protected.
Ms Sun Xueling: I thank the Member for her two supplementary questions. On the
first point, the MSF’s family and domestic violence awareness training has been rolled
out. I mentioned that we have engaged 7,550 individuals, many of whom are teachers.
We have a curriculum in place and the topmost in this curriculum includes sharing with
teachers what are the different forms of abuse.
I use the term "family violence" but actually, within this context, there are different
forms of it, such as physical violence, sexual abuse, neglect, psychological and emotional
abuse. So, we teach our teachers who come for this training that all these forms of neglect
and abuse, all come under the ambit of family and domestic violence.
We fully recognise that victims or survivors may respond differently, especially
when we are dealing with children. That is why we have focused on teachers, because
they are an important touchpoint with children and young persons. So, in the training, we
also train our teachers to recognise how children and young persons may respond or show
symptoms of such abuse and neglect. For instance, is the child more withdrawn than
usual? Are there visible marks on the child? Is the child adverse to physical contact? Are
there changes in the child's behaviour? Has the child lost appetite, not interested anymore
in the games and the activities that the child used to be interested in?
Some of our SSAs also use play therapy. We have observed that some of the
children, because of their young age, they are not able to verbalise their personal
experience, not able to talk about it in first person terms. Instead, they have to use toys,
other objects and talk about it from a third-person perspective because that is their way of
protecting themselves from further hurt. These are ways that children and young persons
can communicate. Our teachers and our social service professionals are made aware and
sensitive to the point that children may respond in such ways. So, that is the first point on
what we aim to do and continue to try to do through the family and domestic violence
awareness training.
On the second point, we have a specialised division called the Clinical and Forensic
Psychology Service team which provides specialised psychological services to children,
youths and their family, and in particular, they have a good understanding of how to
understand the profile and needs of children who have undergone trauma and abuse, and
how to communicate with these children and their families. We will look at how to
ensure that this expertise is also further translated and communicated to frontline
professionals, which include the teachers and social service professionals that I had
talked about.
Mr Speaker: Ms Nadia Ahmad Samdin.
Ms Nadia Ahmad Samdin: Speaker, thank you for your indulgence. Minister of
State, with all due respect, this is a case of a child who first witnessed her mother's
suicide and then was sexually abused by her own biological father, before then being
sexually abused by this fatherly figure. I think what many people truly want to know is
beyond training, how do we improve the current processes? How is the home looking at
improving its current protocol, recognising that constant, or even daily check-ins, are too
resource-intensive? How do we really strengthen the rigour applied across the different
MSF agencies to ensure that this does not happen again, as much as possible?
Ms Sun Xueling: I thank the Member for her follow-up questions. I would say this:
we would spare no effort when it comes to training our social service professionals to
identify signs of abuse. That is their job and when social service professionals come to
this profession and want to help children and young persons, in particular in children's
homes, they are well intentioned and this is what they set out to do every day.
So, like I said, this incident is something that has shaken the community. Nobody
wants to see this, in particular, the social service professionals who have been in contact
with the child. We all know the traumatic experience of this child. It is terrible for a
young person to have to undergo this in her own biological family, to seek refuge in a
children's home and to have a glimpse of a future with a prospective adopter, only to be
abused at the hands of this potentially trusted adult that she has come into contact with.
Like I said, this has shaken the community. What we will continue to do, is that even
though training sounds like a very generic term, it is a very important one because it is
fundamental to equipping our social service professionals to have the means and the
background to identify, to prevent and to stop abuse from happening.
I would like to further reinforce the point that the social service professionals, with
all the resources that they have and they are managing many cases at the same time, they
are in contact with the child through supervised visitations, check-ins, home visits.
During COVID-19, there was the added element of check-ins over video. But, of course,
post-COVID-19, we have replaced that with physical home visits because that,
fundamentally, is the best way of assessing the environment.
But what is very, very important is that we really need members of the public to be
together with us in this fight to protect our children. As you can imagine, for a young
person or child who is experiencing this, you never know at which point and what might
trigger the child to finally open up. When he or she decides to open up, then there must
be a trusted adult nearby for him or her to open up to. In this case, it was a teacher who
was open, who had obviously spent time building a nurturing and trusting relationship
with the child; and it was one such teacher whom the child had trusted and whom she
confided in.
So, I would say that the most fundamental, and perhaps the most comprehensive,
way of tackling this issue is to raise greater awareness among more members of the
public, in particular, persons who have immediate touchpoints with children and,
therefore, I mentioned teachers, I mentioned neighbours, I mentioned friends.
At the same time, I would also like to share that we had rolled out the hand signal for
help because we want to make sure that whether there is opportunity for the child to be in
the community and should he or she decide to disclose this abuse, that he or she is able to
reach out for help. We hope that members of the public will recognise what the sign
means and please call the National Anti-Violence and Sexual Harassment helpline or
reach out to Social Service Offices or family violence specialist centres, our protection
specialist centres, so that help can be given to this survivor victim of family violence as
soon as possible.
Mr Speaker: Assoc Prof Jamus Lim.
Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim (Sengkang): I thank the Minister of State for her
comprehensive response to the safeguards that the Ministry has in place. Let me state at
the outset that I fully agree with the exhaustive, almost to the point of onerous, processes
that are necessary to protect the children in Home Study Reports and the various other
safeguard mechanisms.
That said, I wish to caution against going too far in the other direction and let me
elaborate. I have had residents who wish to adopt the children of their spouse from
second marriages. Based on their feedback, this process tends to be very drawn out, and
more often than not, the child is of a foreign nationality. And so, the Permanent
Residency and citizenship process, based on what they have shared, is very lengthy.
I think, in this case, it is a little bit different just because at least one biological parent
tends to be present.
I wonder whether the Ministry will, even as they review their processes to protect the
child, not to go too far in the other direction and make the process of adoption more
onerous, especially for children that result from second marriages.
Ms Sun Xueling: I thank the Member for raising this. I suppose the Member has a
specific case in his mind when he shared this. If he does not mind, perhaps after this
Sitting, he could share the case with me offline, so we can take a closer look at it.
In general, for prospective adopters, what happens in the process is that they first
have to attend a pre-adoption briefing and they have to undergo a comprehensive
Adoption Suitability Assessment which is conducted by social service staff from an
MSF-accredited adoption agency.
The prospective adopters have to first obtain a favourable Home Study Report that I
mentioned earlier, before they can proceed to identify a child to adopt. If the child is a
foreigner, and I think this is a point the Member raised in the case, the prospective
adopter would have to apply for a Dependant's Pass, so that the child can reside in
Singapore while undergoing the adoption process.
After the Dependant's Pass is granted, the prospective adopter can apply to the
Family Justice Courts (FJC) to adopt. That would then be the MSF’s Guardian-in-
Adoption, which is appointed by the FJC who will conduct social investigations. And by
that, I mean checking in with the prospective adopters, family members, character
referees, professionals and so on.
So, as you can see, there is a process in place. Whether it is overly onerous, at the
onset, I think we have to agree in principle that we have to make sure the child's interest,
welfare and well-being – whether or not a Singaporean or a foreign child – has to be front
and centre. That is why we have all these processes in place, to make sure that we are
able to assess and screen the prospective adopter, to make sure that they have the basic
requirements and have the best situation to be able to care for such a child.
So, like I said, I guess the Member has a specific case in mind. If the Member does
not mind, we could take this offline after this.
Mr Speaker: The last supplementary question on this, Mr Dennis Tan. Please keep it
succinct; and likewise, the response.
Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong (Hougang): Thank you, Mr Speaker. I would just like to
ask the Minister of State, whether she is able to share with the House what specific
attributes MSF look for from the prospective adoptive parents of children, specifically
where they may have a traumatic past.
Ms Sun Xueling: I thank the Member for his question. At the stage of pre-adoption
requirements, I had mentioned that the prospective adopter has to undergo a
comprehensive Adoption Suitability Assessment and prospective adopters who wish to
adopt a child with a traumatic history, will need to be assessed if they are able to meet the
child's complex care needs. So, it is one layer above what I shared earlier.
I had also shared that we have a specialised Clinical and Forensic Psychology
Service team. They have the expertise, given that they have dealt with children with a
traumatic history before. So, their input will also be taken in. We will then see whether
the prospective adopters have the capabilities to properly care for such a child, given the
fact that the child has had this unfortunate experience of having a traumatic past previously.